Méditations sartriennes: Péripéties de la notion de vécu
Labyrinth
View Archive Info| Field | Value | |
| Title |
Méditations sartriennes: Péripéties de la notion de vécu
Méditations sartriennes: Péripéties de la notion de vécu |
|
| Creator |
Andrée, Lars
|
|
| Subject |
Philosophy, Literature
Jean-Paul Sartre, Gustave Flaubert, lived experience, literature, biographical writing — — |
|
| Description |
Sartrian Meditations: Vicissitudes of the Notion of Lived ExperienceOne must have lived to write the story of his life and you must have some lived experience to describe the life of another - this may seem like a truism. However, this idea poses different questions, which are the subject of this article. For example, if we admit the general rule that one who writes about music has some knowledge of music, as the one who writes about science has some knowledge of scientific achievements, then we can conclude that the writer on literature should at least have some idea of literature. So it is surprising how Bourdieu in his book Les règles de l'art: Genèse et structure du champ littéraire reversed this opinion. Bourdieu suggests that Sartre, being a writer, lack of the ability to understand Flaubert. For Bourdieu it is the writer's position which makes Sartre incapable of writing about literature. Through a critical reinterpretation of Bourdieu's theses, the author shows the difficulties of biographical writing as such, as well as the problems of (understanding) the Sartrean notion of lived experience and its (possible) applications.
Sartrian Meditations: Vicissitudes of the Notion of Lived Experience One must have lived to write the story of his life and you must have some lived experience to describe the life of another - this may seem like a truism. However, this idea poses different questions, which are the subject of this article. For example, if we admit the general rule that one who writes about music has some knowledge of music, as the one who writes about science has some knowledge of scientific achievements, then we can conclude that the writer on literature should at least have some idea of literature. So it is surprising how Bourdieu in his book Les règles de l'art: Genèse et structure du champ littéraire reversed this opinion. Bourdieu suggests that Sartre, being a writer, lack of the ability to understand Flaubert. For Bourdieu it is the writer's position which makes Sartre incapable of writing about literature. Through a critical reinterpretation of Bourdieu's theses, the author shows the difficulties of biographical writing as such, as well as the problems of (understanding) the Sartrean notion of lived experience and its (possible) applications. |
|
| Publisher |
Axia Academic Publishers
|
|
| Contributor |
—
— |
|
| Date |
2015-12-20
|
|
| Type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Text Analysis, Literary Criticism — |
|
| Format |
application/pdf
|
|
| Identifier |
http://www.axiapublishers.com/ojs/index.php/labyrinth/article/view/22
10.25180/lj.v17i2.22 |
|
| Source |
Labyrinth; Vol 17, No 2 (2015): History and Choice: Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-2015); 63-73
1561-8927 2410-4817 10.25180/lj.v17i2 |
|
| Language |
fra
|
|
| Relation |
http://www.axiapublishers.com/ojs/index.php/labyrinth/article/view/22/27
|
|
| Coverage |
French Philosophy
Contemporary Philosophy Continental Philosophy — — — |
|
| Rights |
Copyright (c) 2015 Lars Andrée
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
|
Axia Digital Library